At 7.30pm the meeting was opened with the newspaper report stating that the Constable of St Helier took his seat to applause with the Secretary of the meeting H B Jerram, “armed with a large number of law books, an ominous sign in view of the nomination of a lady candidate.”
Once the candidates were nominated the Constable John Edwin Pinel stood to address the crowd. He said that “on occasions of this kind it was his duty to define the position of affairs, in order to see if the nominations as laid before the Assembly are according to the Laws and Customs of the Island.” He went through the various nominees declaring them eligible to stand until he got to the name of Mrs Trachy. When he got to her name he said, “he had to declare that the third candidate was not eligible by the Laws and Customs of the Island. If they took the Laws of the Island regarding Deputies they would find the words ‘Every British subject aged 20 enjoying civil rights will be eligible for the office of Deputy.’ This Law…was enacted in 1857, and at that period “tout sujet Britannique referred only to the male sex. He had to ask himself what could have happened since 1857 which could allow women to take their place in the States, and he had found that except for the alteration in the Law on Franchise there had been no change.” The newspaper reported that the proposer and seconder could enter a protest but no protest was entered and the official meeting was closed.
Soon after Mrs Trachy’s nominator, Captain Lyons-Montgomery, brought a remonstrance to the Royal Court against the Constable for disbarring her nomination as a Deputy. The case was heard in January 1923.
Extraordinary rhetoric was heard in the case with the officials saying that the Constable had done the right thing and comparing Mrs Trachy’s candidature to that of a ‘corpse’ or a ‘madman’.